Chain · United States · data through September 2026

L Label Shopper

Iceflower tracks 69 Label Shopper stores across 15 US states. It ranks #9 of 19 tracked US discount off-price stores by card spend. Its share of tracked category spend moved -13.2% over the last year.

Rankings come from real card and bank transactions across a panel of 130M+ US and EU consumers. We publish relative growth and rankings, never revenue figures. About the data

Tracked stores
69
States
15
Category
Discount Off-Price Stores
Category rank
#9

Growth

Label Shopper against its category

The biggest tracked US discount off-price stores by card spend, with year-over-year growth of category share. Share means a chain's slice of tracked category spend. It can decline while the chain's own sales grow. The chart tracks Label Shopper's share of the category quarter by quarter, indexed to 2024 Q4 = 100.

# Chain YoY share
1 R Ross Dress for Less logo Ross Dress for Less +3.3%
2 B Burlington logo Burlington -3.7%
3 G Gabe's logo Gabe's -12.2%
4 D dd's DISCOUNTS logo dd's DISCOUNTS -0.8%
5 F Forman Mills logo Forman Mills -12.4%
6 M Marden's logo Marden's -10.5%
7 H Hamrick's logo Hamrick's -11.0%
8 S Shoppers World -15.3%
9 L Label Shopper -13.2%
10 B Bealls Outlet logo Bealls Outlet -20.0%

Share of tracked category spend, indexed

100 89.2 2024 Q4 2026 Q3

Store footprint

Store map

69 tracked Label Shopper locations across 15 US states.

Customer overlap

Who shops at Label Shopper

Tracked chains Label Shopper customers also buy from more than a similarly active shopper would, indexed to the strongest overlap (100). From real card transactions.

G Georgetown IGA 100
J JBK Hardware 88
S Sunny's Mart 82
N Norway Smoke Shop 69
B Bayside Market 67
M Molly's Mart 62
L Lewes Market 61
T The Lake Store 59
M Mirabito logo Mirabito 57

More trends

Ready to see your market clearly?

Create an account, pick a plan, and explore your merchants, competitors and customers the way they actually behave.

Working in fashion, apparel and footwear? See consumer transaction data for fashion, apparel and footwear →